THREE TIERS

One framework. Three tiers.
So you can start where you are.

EW-AiRM™ scales from a single AI system start-up to a global enterprise running hundreds of deployments. The framework is identical throughout; only the depth of its implementation changes.

'Core' is not a lesser EW-AiRM^TM version and 'Full' is not the "real deal" everyone migrates to: The tier is a match to organisational reality, not a maturity ladder.

Noyau

ENTRY

Start-/scale-ups and limited AI deployment:

<100 employees
1–5 AI system

Six pillars applied at conceptual level

HAiPECR^TM run as a pre-deployment filter

Top-tier MIT risks only (Primary mappings)

One named accountable owner per system

Quarterly review cycle

Self-assessment using the Maturity Tool

Adopt Core →

Standard

RECOMMENDED

For mid-market firms and regulated SMEs:

100–1,000 employees
5–25 systems

All six pillars with documented evidence

HAIPECR^TM pre-deployment + continuous review

Primary + Secondary MIT mappings

Two-line accountability (system + risk owner)

Six AI Black Swan categories rehearsed

Monthly KXI dashboard, quarterly board pack

Adopt Standard →

Full

ENTERPRISE

For global enterprises and systemically important institutions:

1,000+ employees
25+ systems)

All six pillars with second-line review

HAiPECR^TM audit trail per deployment

Full Primary / Secondary / Tertiary mappings

Three-line accountability + board sponsor

All eight Black Swan categories annually

Weekly KXI, monthly risk, quarterly board

Adopt Full →

FLOOR CONDITIONS: The 5 Non-Negotiables

Cinq choses que chaque niveau doit faire.

Responsabilité nommée pour chaque système d'IA déployé

HAiPEICR^TM run as documented pre-deployment filter

Capacité de contournement humain testée avec un SLA de 4 heures

Acceptation documentée du risque par le conseil d'administration ou la direction

Procédure de signalement des incidents, avec destinataire désigné

You can use our tiering and the assessment tools as diagnostic (you already have AI deployed), as a roadmap (you are about to deploy), or as a reference guide (you have specific governance problems).

Not sure which tier fits?

The Maturity Assessment Tool will tell you in 20 minutes. Free, runs in your browser, nothing leaves your machine.

Run the assessment →

Talk to us →

The Human-Ai.Institute est un Think/Do Tank indépendant qui organise un dialogue multilatéral et multipartite sur la gouvernance de l'IA. L'Institut collabore avec l'ONU, l'UNESCO, l'OCDE, la Commission européenne et des gouvernements du monde entier.

Accueil de EW-AiRM™ — le cadre ouvert à trois couches pour la gestion des risques liés à l'IA à l'échelle de l'entreprise, fondé sur des normes sous licence publique et aligné sur l'UNESCO, la CEE-ONU, le NIST, l'ISO et l'IA Act de l'UE.

CONSEIL, FORMATION ET ACCREDITATION

Des services de conseil commercial, de formation et de conseil sont fournis par De-Risking Solutions Ltd. et RiskAi.Ai

SOLUTIONS IA ET TECHNOLOGIQUES

Les solutions d'IA, d'outils d'agents et technologiques sont fournies par Human-Ai.Solutions.

ORGANISATIONS

The Human-Ai.Institute

est géré et maintenu par
De-Risking Solutions Ltd.

E-mail :
contact [at] human-ai.institute

One framework. Three tiers. So you can start where you are.

'Core' is not a lesser EW-AiRMTM version and 'Full' is not the "real deal" everyone migrates to: The tier is a match to organisational reality, not a maturity ladder.